<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalists Hate Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blognetworkwatch.com/blog-network-watch-news/journalists-hate-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.com/blog-network-watch-news/journalists-hate-blogs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Wordpress Webblog</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.com/blog-network-watch-news/journalists-hate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>My Wordpress Webblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 22:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blognetworkwatch.com/blog-network-watch-news/journalists-hate-blogs/#comment-737</guid>
		<description>[...] Even still, the suggestion that bloggers are more connected than journalists is intriguing. We&#8217;ve all heard the ongoing blogger vs. journalist debate (Bloggers sacrifice accuracy for timeliness! Wait, no, bloggers are more accurate! They don&#8217;t cite sources! No, they link more!), and it&#8217;s pretty clear that some journalists aren&#8217;t fans of the increasing popularity of bloggers. However, in February Digital Journal pointed to an ifocos study that surveyed Americans and found that 55% of Americans &quot;said bloggers are important to the future of American journalism.&quot; The survey also found that Most respondents (53%) also said the rise of free Internet-based media pose the greatest opportunity to the future of professional journalism and three in four (76%) said the Internet has had a positive impact on the overall quality of journalism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even still, the suggestion that bloggers are more connected than journalists is intriguing. We&#8217;ve all heard the ongoing blogger vs. journalist debate (Bloggers sacrifice accuracy for timeliness! Wait, no, bloggers are more accurate! They don&#8217;t cite sources! No, they link more!), and it&#8217;s pretty clear that some journalists aren&#8217;t fans of the increasing popularity of bloggers. However, in February Digital Journal pointed to an ifocos study that surveyed Americans and found that 55% of Americans &quot;said bloggers are important to the future of American journalism.&quot; The survey also found that Most respondents (53%) also said the rise of free Internet-based media pose the greatest opportunity to the future of professional journalism and three in four (76%) said the Internet has had a positive impact on the overall quality of journalism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

